WDSU.com is reporting that the New Orleans crime camera system is overly expensive and ineffective. Originally projected to cost $2 million in tax payer funds, the project has cost $6 million so far and is still not complete. Criticism comes after the city’s interim inspector released a report citing serious flaws in the system.
The system was originally conceived as a way to deter criminals and better identify criminal activity within the city; however, out of the 250 installed cameras, only 145 are currently in operation. In addition to the low density of cameras, other recent reports have indicated that crime areas do little to no good in deterring overall crime, and don’t offer much help in identifying criminals.
Do you think a city-wide crime camera system could work, or are all such systems a waste of taxpayer money? Leave a comment.
Stumble It!
The Crime Map 
3 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 5, 2009 at 7:56 pm
David Adams
Cameras work best if you don’t care about moving the crime around the corner. Unless you can roll out cameras ubiquitously and secretly, so the bad guys don’t know where they are, they are only a deterrent for the area they’re pointing at. On the other hand, people who aren’t careful enough to know they’re there are convicted based on surveillance camera evidence sometimes.
March 11, 2009 at 1:59 pm
DC Police Say Cameras Reduce Crime « The Crime Map
[…] DC | by crblogger Although recently the effectiveness of crime cameras has been disputed by New Orleans and refuted by a study done at UC Berkeley, Washington DC police are saying that crime in DC was […]
May 19, 2009 at 5:34 pm
UK Researchers Find CCTV Generally Ineffective at Preventing Crime « The Crime Map
[…] Question the Benefit of Surveillance Cameras New Orleans Crime Cameras Come Under Fire Is Chicago Relying to Heavily on Blue Light Surveillance […]